Search blog.co.uk

The very first earth shaker: Copernicus

by ranfuchs @ 2008-02-08 - 23:45:15

copernicus2-1

So let's continue our exploration of the birth of modern science ...

Since early history, the scientists who studied the heavens were the only scholars to use mathematics, and the terms astronomer, astrologer and mathematician were virtually interchangeable. They calculated the dates of the holy days, developed methods to draw astrological charts, and forecast the position of the zodiac signs and the movement of the planets. However, despite their skillful observations, measurement and calculations, many questions remained unanswered. They could not account for the changes in the brightness of the planets, nor for their apparent retrograde movement. Their models did not explain why Venus and Mercury were never seen far from the sun, and they could not even agree on the order of the planets. However, it was not their role to ponder such theological matters. They were mathematicians, and calculation was what they did.

All this changed in 1514, when a Polish astronomer, Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543) circled amongst a few of his friends an unsigned hand-written book, Little Commentary. In his book, Copernicus introduced the heliocentric model, in which the sun, rather than the earth, was at the center of the universe, and all planets, including earth, were orbiting around it. With a single model, Copernicus could explain the apparent movement of the planets, the sun and the stars. His model could also account for the changes in the brightness of the planets, and offered a singular method of ordering them and calculating their relative distances from the sun with amazing accuracy (less than 10% difference from our current measurements.) Copernicus knew, however, that the clear advantages of his model would not protect him from the hostile reaction of the orthodox authorities and the Inquisition, and it was not until 1543 – the year of his death – that he eventually published his complete work On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres.

Trackback address for this post:

authimage

Comments, Trackbacks: Hide subcomments

jackfrostjackfrost pro
2008-02-08 @ 23:47

Some say that he never got anywhere as he was forever going around in circles!! :))

ranfuchsranfuchs pro
2008-02-08 @ 23:51

he still is. Unlike all of us, of course, who are going in straight lines :)

rubychoorubychoo [Member]
2008-02-09 @ 00:51

Every child subject to the National Curriculum (and who is not truanting and who is listening) is the sum of all learning, and they are wise beyond the measure of the ancients.

OK, they don't know , (and their teachers often don't know...none of us know) precicely how the recieved wisdom got all the way to their brains from their ears ...but it's a process that seems to work and takes us forward, whatever our misgivings

People are in equal parts amazing and monstrous.

ranfuchsranfuchs pro
2008-02-09 @ 09:29

It's interesting what you say, but I don't totally agree. Most children still only learn the updated knowledge in the books. But they have no better understanding. For most study is merely a belief that what’s in the books is right.

Because our knowledge is more advanced, they learn more advanced things, but still they merely parrot it.

I could see it for myself with computers. Many claim that the young generation know lots about computer. The fact is that most of them know nothing about computers more than they know about TV or taking a photo. It’s a tool that works for them but really they know nothing about. Ask most kids what is a bus, or how memory used in the computer, they have no idea. Just a generation ago you couldn’t use a computer without knowing it.

So my theory is that when knowledge is created, some learn and understand it, but for most it’s a mystery. When the number of those who know increases, it becomes a popular knowledge, and for most people understanding goes.

I am not going to ask you personally, but in a latest survey that asked why winter are colder than summers, about 70% gave the wrong answer.

deleted user [Visitor]

2008-03-17 @ 02:29

you put that point across really well. and you're right. I know how to use a toaster to make toast but I could never make a toaster myself. is that what you mean? I'm the ultimate layman you see....

ranfuchsranfuchs pro
2008-03-17 @ 09:28

For an ultimate layman you got my point perfectly well :)

PrettyintelligentprincessPrettyintelligentprincess [Member]
2008-02-09 @ 01:44

Erm.....what on earth could I comment on? It's factual and true and well that's it.

ranfuchsranfuchs pro
2008-02-09 @ 09:30

you could say, for instance, 'I liked it', or 'I didn't like it' :)

PrettyintelligentprincessPrettyintelligentprincess [Member]
2008-02-09 @ 12:52

Smiling actually...I am trying to imagine your bedside manner....amidst the science and the theory! I do admire your knowledge tho...and I have not forgotten about those poems...btw. Will send soon.
Take care.

ranfuchsranfuchs pro
2008-02-09 @ 12:55

and how does it all relate to my bedside manners?
I don't believe in numbers you know :)

kaliyugashaktimamakaliyugashaktimama pro
2008-02-09 @ 04:27

Ah, Copernicus, a fellow Pole! I'm so proud.
Good post - very interesting :)

ranfuchsranfuchs pro
2008-02-09 @ 09:38

I'm glad that you liked it. He was the very first true scientist. Checked the assumptions, did not believe what was the common wisdom, and went against the crowd.

Just to show how common wisdom can be so misleading, and how democracy of thought can be so evil

He is one of my heroes. Two other polish in the list :)

Leave a comment :

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.
Allowed XHTML tags: <!, p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, a, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small, img>
URLs, email, AIM and ICQs will be converted automatically.
Options:
 
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email & url)
Validation code:
Please enter the above code here:
For protection from spambots (case-sensitive).